Brad Wardell's site for talking about the customization of Windows.
Published on January 16, 2009 By Frogboy In OS Customization

image

The new WinCustomize is going to be a radical departure from what we have today.

In the web 2.0 age, we can do a lot of interesting things that should greatly improve the navigation of the site. The days of clicking, waiting for the page to load, clicking, waiting for the page to load and so forth will go away.

Instead, the site will feel more akin to a desktop application. Want to see the most popular skinners, click on tab and it'll expand to show it.

The site will end up being far cleaner, far faster, and far easier to use than what we have today.


Comments (Page 4)
7 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 6  Last
on Jan 17, 2009

Me thinks all this banter is mainly moot.  I think the decisions have been made and the format is basically done.IMHO.

lol Ed, I reckon it's all done as well, they're just easing us into it under the guise of previews

on Jan 17, 2009
i would still like to personalize and or skin my own personal page........
on Jan 17, 2009
Looking good all!
on Jan 17, 2009

Personally though I'd like to see a fully working core site before any extra's or new ideas were considered.

Not SD's style, if past is prologue.

Should be great in any event.  Looking forward to it.

on Jan 17, 2009

Forgive me if anyone mentioned this aready, chose to jump straigh to the end to ask. Would this concept for WC be considered for the JU website as well? I mean, I know there is no downloading on that site but the tab concept sounds great.

on Jan 17, 2009

please, dear Lord... or.. Brad.. as the case may be.. bring back 'last post read' function.

Having to constantly click last page and then scroll down to the bottom should be unheard of on todays forums.

on Jan 17, 2009

lol V, and change POST to what it really is --> TOPIC   it's so confuzzling! and reply to --> post

on Jan 17, 2009

vStyler
please, dear Lord... or.. Brad.. as the case may be.. bring back 'last post read' function.

Having to constantly click last page and then scroll down to the bottom should be unheard of on todays forums.

Works fine here.

Tailsgirl
lol V, and change POST to what it really is --> TOPIC   it's so confuzzling! and reply to --> post

I totally agree. This is the only site I know of that uses that terminology and it's totally confusing.

on Jan 17, 2009

Yep Bebi, I remember back at Invisionize, and.. well.. every other forum I've been to, and run, it really is confusing

on Jan 17, 2009

Tailsgirl
lol V, and change POST to what it really is --> TOPIC   it's so confuzzling! and reply to --> post
I totally agree. This is the only site I know of that uses that terminology and it's totally confusing.
Ahh .  .  the joy of having a newsgroup heritage. (news://news.stardock.com)  It may be archaic. .  but I like it!

on Jan 17, 2009

Works fine here.

Hasnt worked for me since it stopped working months and months ago... anyone else?

 

Doesn't matter what thread I open.. always always... page 1. Of course in the main forum u can click last post.. but that only takes u to the last post..not the last one u read. and I usually navigate from the Recent Activity list anyway... page 1 everytime.

on Jan 17, 2009

Hasnt worked for me since it stopped working months and months ago... anyone else?



Doesn't matter what thread I open.. always always... page 1. Of course in the main forum u can click last post.. but that only takes u to the last post..not the last one u read. and I usually navigate from the Recent Activity list anyway... page 1 everytime.

 

ditto....

 

it's really been a pain.....

on Jan 17, 2009

Works fine here.

Hasnt worked for me since it stopped working months and months ago... anyone else?



Doesn't matter what thread I open.. always always... page 1. Of course in the main forum u can click last post.. but that only takes u to the last post..not the last one u read. and I usually navigate from the Recent Activity list anyway... page 1 everytime.

Same here... last post read hasn't worked for me in months... like 6 to 8 months, if not more.

on Jan 18, 2009

Works fine for me

on Jan 18, 2009

what's the difference in quoting blocks. some have names and some don't???

7 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 6  Last