Yes, I would prefer that one over the hideous color combo on yours any day of the year. Is that impossible, you think? This is also how Windows 10 can look without any customization apps:

What I am trying to say is that when being the CEO of a company selling customizing products for Windows, you could do better. But then again, difference of opinion has never been tolerated well on Stardock.

I am talking about functionality.  I don't mind you having a difference of opinion.  Do you?

Heck, just Start10 is better than the default Windows 10 desktop.

It's the additional functionality that matters though.  Being able to make use of the power of a modern desktop.  What someone finds "pretty" is in the eye of the beholder.

Then you build on that functionality:

Add modern, high DPI aware mouse cursors with CursorFX.

Integrate your data environment with your desktop with Fences.

Expand on the tab metaphor in web browsers to the OS with Groupy.

and so forth.

I think most people here would prefer pretty over function.   

Not my cup of tea, I (personally) prefer the classic start menu, don't care about tiles, or columns, all I see is Start10, and maybe some others, but no Windowblinds, am I to assume, it's (Windowblind) on the way out, if so, I'll just dump Windows altogether, and stick with my Mac, at least it's better to look at for not being skinned?   

 

I disagree ALMonty, I think most people here would actually prefer a great design that also has great functionality.

Tom, I think Al meant IF they had to lose one to get the other.

 

I agree Tom,  but, if the majority of people are for the dull Window 10 look, then I’m out , as I stated, I’ll dump Widows, and buy me an iMac.   

Ok, I see the WindowBlinds icon on the taskbar of the second screenshot.  But I don't recognize the WB if you have one loaded, and it looks kinda square, and plain.

Got to love when you edit the orignial post (ouch!) and add an additional screenshot (even full size this time!) + 2 scrennies to prove what? I have not uttered one word about functionality. All I said is that the first screenshot you posted looks bad (L-O-O-K-S) coming from the CEO of a large company selling customization products & productivity tools for PCs.

Difference of opinion is no problem to me. It's how it's handled that matters.

I was thinking the second screenshot wasn't there when I made my comment.

I edited the original to add more screenshots.  I didn't change the one that was there.   They're not there to prove anything other than providing additional examples.

I don't like the default Windows 10 look.  And while *my* personal taste may not be in line with yours, it is irrelevant to the topic at hand since the thrust of the screenshot was to show the functionality of the apps I mentioned.  

And I still think your effort at doing just that in that particular screenshot, sucks.

Out.