Brad Wardell's site for talking about the customization of Windows.
Published on February 26, 2015 By Frogboy In PC Gaming

Interesting article on Kotaku today in which activist Anita Sarkeesian expresses what she’s looking for from game developers.

Ultimately, she is looking for games to keep 8 guidelines in mind when making games:

1. Avoid the Smurfette principle (don't have just one female character in an ensemble cast, let alone one whose personality is more or less "girl" or "woman.")
2. "Lingerie is not armor" (Dress female characters as something other than sex objects.)
3. Have female characters of various body types
4. Don't over-emphasize female characters' rear ends, not any more than you would the average male character's.
5. Include more female characters of color.
6. Animate female characters to move the way normal women, soldiers or athletes would move.
7. Record female character voiceover so that pain sounds painful, not orgasmic
8. Include female enemies, but don't sexualize those enemies

So how does Stardock do?

Let’s take a look at Stardock last released game, the popular, critically acclaimed PC strategy game Fallen Enchantress:

1. Avoid the Smurfette principle (don't have just one female character in an ensemble cast, let alone one whose personality is more or less "girl" or "woman.")

Our last game, Fallen Enchantress has female leads and allows players to design female units in total equality with males with equal resource allocation (i.e. we spent an equal amount in the form of hundreds of thousands in art costs) on separate clothing, armor.

Stardock spent hundreds of thousands of dollars creating unique character models and assets to ensure that both males and female units could be created by players.

 

2. "Lingerie is not armor" (Dress female characters as something other than sex objects.)

Same. Fallen Enchantress female armor was functional, practical. As you can see in the above screenshot, the armor is not only not “lingerie” but it lacks breast definition because real female armor wouldn’t have that.

 

3. Have female characters of various body types

We include multiple models for male and females in the game. As any game developer can tell you, this was a non-trivial cost, especially to a small studio because it meant we had to create different types of armor (our armor is not a texture being applied).

 

4. Don't over-emphasize female characters' rear ends, not any more than you would the average male character's.

We modeled our units proportions based on real world measurements.

image

In Fallen Enchantress, players can design their own units, leaders, etc. Multiple body sizes included.

 

5. Include more female characters of color.

Done.

Literally any color you’d like. Even blue.

6.Animate female characters to move the way normal women, soldiers or athletes would move.

Done.

7. Record female character voiceover so that pain sounds painful, not orgasmic

Done.

8. Include female enemies, but don't sexualize those enemies

image

The Villain, Ceresa was female

and

according to statistics the most popular HERO of Fallen Enchantress was…

 

image

Procipinee. Queen of the West, heir of Amarian. The world’s most powerful channeler of magic.

 

But wait…that’s not all…

>50% of the source code in Fallen Enchantress was written by women (plural) and much of the art in the game was created by women.

I look forward to Ms. Sarkeesian holding Stardock up as the model of what game studios should be doing.  In fact, her and her allies are welcome to find any modern game or studio that has comparable representation of women both in terms of in-game characters as well as development.

I won’t hold my breath.


Comments (Page 2)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Mar 01, 2015

Frogboy
I don't think it's passive aggressive. It's pretty active.


I'm pointing out the hypocrisy. They don't really want these types of games. They don't really care.  Their "issues" are just a fig leaf to give their cause some semblance of legitimacy.

I have to point out that this is a genetic fallacy. Unless you can quote her being caught red-handed having double standards when it comes to Fallen Enchantress, I do not think you have a point.

 

That said, Fallen Enchantress is relatively gender neutral, yes. That said, it's somewhat easier in a Strategy game that doesn't rely heavily on narration. That said, it *is* performing better than most game I know in its category.

on Mar 02, 2015

Doesn't matter what games you output when you've been labeled. Not only does Brad Wardell have a history of sexually harassing his female employees but he is also directly criticizing Sarkeesian / GamerGhazi in posts like these. I mean, let's at least be fair. Brad Wardell is an outspoken critic of their movement. That means he's the ENEMY. 

 

on Mar 02, 2015

It's a positive thing to be able to look at a piece of media and be critical about it's portrayal of certain genders and gender stereotypes.

 

Anybody who wants to shut down the discussion before it begins will just end up being on the wrong side of history

on Mar 03, 2015

Being on the wrong side of history ain't all it's cracked up to be.  Without women voters we'd still be electing presidents for reasons other than whether they have a full head of hair.

on Mar 03, 2015

Being on the wrong side of history is at least as bad as it is cracked up to be.  It causes you to make stupid trolling comments that are part of the reason there is such heated over-reaction to gender issues in the first place. 

on Mar 03, 2015

Some say history is cyclical - in that case, which phase of it are we now?

on Mar 03, 2015

If brad is sexist please do tell. I haven't even heard one comment. I support gender equality not sameness, or superority. Or feminizing everything. I think you should br allowed to ask out coworkers. I don't agree with any movementbthat can't handle equality, but needs to be the same,  snd superior.  I guess I'm an enemy i support equality,  not gender seness,  or superior ity.

on Mar 03, 2015

Heavenfall

Not only does Brad Wardell have a history of sexually harassing his female employees

You know, it's actually WISE to adopt the use of 'alleged' when making assertions such as this.... just as 'normal' public media does.

 The reason is that false statements attacking a person's reputation/good character leave you genuinely wide open to legal recourse for libel, slander, and/or defamation [you choose - though it was written and ergo - libel].

People on the internet really need to be aware they are NOT above the law - international boundaries do not protect you.  These Forums are subject to US Laws and I do know of people pursued [and penalised] in Australia for libel committed on a US Forum [wasn't one of Stardock's though].

It happens.

I'll leave it to Brad if he wishes to enlighten re the origins of the ALLEGATION that, thanks to the vagaries of the interweb has a life of its own...

 

on Mar 03, 2015

I was going to state that he was 'alleged' to have harassed someone. In fact said harassed person had to write an apology for the false accusation.  The previous poster did not do any research on Brad at all. This is exactly the kind of crap SJW's love to push and it works with un-informed people as we see here. 

on Mar 03, 2015



though it was written and ergo - libel

It looks like it was a poorly thought out, and poorly written, attempt at sarcasm.  Still libel though.

There was actually some discussion about the topic before that.  The next post is also quite bad, being analogous to "if you don't agree with me you are big dumb dummy head."  Yay for derailment?

 

on Mar 03, 2015

Being on the wrong side of history is at least as bad as it is cracked up to be.  It causes you to make stupid trolling comments that are part of the reason there is such heated over-reaction to gender issues in the first place.

 

Other people having no sense of humor isn't my problem.  Try cultivating an intellect instead of a chip on your shoulder, it's an absurdity to find offense over a comment you find absurd.

 

It's also my Mother's actual opinion that women should never have been allowed to vote.  I figure we were doomed anyway, Woodrow Wilson was one of the biggest fuckups to ever be elected president, and he was one of the main obstacles to the suffrage movement, as opposed to a product of it's success once he gave up blocking it over protests and hunger strikes during WW1.

 

The point is moot regardless though, history is rarely true in such things.  From a historical perspective, the Democrats are the party of suffrage and the evil Republicans are waging a war on women.  That their right to vote passed despite a democratic filibuster clearly didn't hurt the party that was on the wrong side as they've simply rewritten it to their benefit thanks to the idiocy and ignorance of the population at large.

on Mar 03, 2015

..

 

....

 

.......

 

Sorry.  I've nothing much to contribute to this discussion.

 

Been a bit distracted ogling Google images of Lara Croft.

 

.......

 

.....

 

I'll be back in a minute.

 

.....

 

Make it ten.

 

on Mar 04, 2015

Larsenex

I was going to state that he was 'alleged' to have harassed someone. In fact said harassed person had to write an apology for the false accusation.  The previous poster did not do any research on Brad at all. This is exactly the kind of crap SJW's love to push and it works with un-informed people as we see here. 

You missed the point completely. Whether true or not, the SJW narrative is that Brad is sexist and harassing employees. 

on Mar 04, 2015

psychoak



Other people having no sense of humor isn't my problem.  Try cultivating an intellect instead of a chip on your shoulder, it's an absurdity to find offense over a comment you find absurd.


Come on now, people not laughing at your jokes is always a problem for a comedian.

It has been established in my real life conversations that I have both a sense of humor and an intellect, maybe even above average in both categories.  They both lead me to the conclusion that your problem is that you are just not funny, at least not in this case.

Whether it is you or me that is the problem, maybe both, there is a problem and all your denial will not change that.  Everybody's over-reaction on both sides may make the discussion tiresome, but denial will make it worse.  Brad seems to know it is a problem and does what he can about it as CEO of a gaming company.  I admire that.  Others campaign cluelessly.  That is contemptible.  Then others try to deny everything with a poor attempt at humor.  Find your own appropriate adjective for that kind of behavior.

There is a problem and it deserves better responses than you and many others seem willing to give it.  There are people who deserve mockery, but the issue does not.

on Mar 04, 2015

Okay I admit, I haven't read all the comments.  With that being said here are some arguments and compliments to the original post.

Compliments...

  • Creating a game where women are not "sex" objects.  
  • Giving the female character a chance to be the hero.  (Aliens, Terminator)
  • Stardock games in general have a vast variety of customization to all aspects of games

Arguments...

  • Don't generalize everything.
  • Men and Woman are not physically the same and shouldn't be treated as such.  (not sexist stating generalized facts use to advantage I understand there are exceptions)
    • Woman naturally are more agile (flexible and smaller) allow the game to use this to their advantage (not sexual but, sneak into places where larger characters can't go.)  [Again I understand this doesn't hold true to every person]
    • Men are naturally stronger and faster, allow this to be used to their advantage or disadvantage depending on the situation.
    • Men tend to have more of a "beer gut" than woman, especially as they age.  (penalize them as they get older for this)
    • Alien (non-human) characters throw these arguments out the window as your creation is your pallet.

Overall I love Stardock games and think they are on the correct path.  I agree women are not "sex" objects and "lingerie" is not armor.  You shouldn't promote that, however, in the real world men and women do use "sex" to get ahead.  Don't know how you could add that to games without going overboard but, if I have a nice six pack tan and what women tend to think of as a nice body, maybe I try to sneak in using other strategies other than fighting my way through the gate, strip off my armor and give the ladies something to look at?  Same thing the other way with women.  

Like I said that is not appropriate in every situation, however, if I'm a spy for a certain level sure.  If I'm fighting my way through sewers and prison cells no, I'm most likely not dressing sexy.

3 Pages1 2 3